Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section: Ethical Considerations for Midwives
Manavi Handa, RM and Andrea Robertson, RM
Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) and decisions regarding the safest mode and place of delivery can be contentious in contemporary obstetrics. The choice of birthplace adds additional layers to ethical concerns, particularly for midwives, who are often the only care providers attending birth outside the hospital setting. Current guidelines and evidence, drawing largely on obstetrical literature and the hospital environment, recommend hospital birth for anyone with a prior cesarean section. However, despite guidelines and care provider recommendations, a small proportion of women will continue to request midwife-attended homebirth. Ethical debates about VBAC have largely been inattentive to the desires of these women and the unique situation of midwives who may be presented with such requests. We will explore the ethical nuances of choice of birthplace for women planning a vaginal homebirth after cesarean section (HBAC). Analysis suggests that there may be implications to denying choice and some burden on midwives to continue to provide care for women planning HBAC, even when homebirth may not be considered the safest option.
Author’s Note: The order of authors in this paper is alphabetical and not intended to relate to work done. This paper was a joint collaboration and authorship was equal and shared
midwifery, vaginal birth after cesarean section, VBAC, homebirth after cesarean section (HBAC), homebirth